Previous Policy - 11.10 Determining Successful Local Area Performance Skip main navigation

Outdated or Unsupported Browser Detected
DWD's website uses the latest technology. This makes our site faster and easier to use across all devices. Unfortunatley, your browser is out of date and is not supported. An update is not required, but it is strongly recommended to improve your browsing experience. To update Internet Explorer to Microsoft Edge visit their website.



Previous Policy - 11.10 Determining Successful Local Area Performance

11.10 Determining Successful Local Area Performance

Effective date: August 7, 2017

The state workforce agency must define the terms "met or exceed" and "failure" prior to the time of the negotiation with the local area.1 A local area's performance on each primary indicator of performance will be characterized as below.2

The primary indicator of performance will be considered to have "exceed" if:

The primary indicator of performance will be considered to have "met" if:

The primary indicator of performance will be considered to have "not met" performance if:

Table 11.10.1: Local Area Example
  Unsubsidized Employment 2nd Quarter Unsubsidized Employment 4th Quarter Median Earnings Credential Attainment Rate Measurable Skill Gain Effectiveness Serving Employers
T1 Adult Individual Indicator Individual Indicator Individual Indicator Individual Indicator Individual Indicator Individual Indicator
T1 Dislocated Worker Individual Indicator Individual Indicator Individual Indicator Individual Indicator Individual Indicator
T1 Youth Individual Indicator Individual Indicator Individual Indicator Individual Indicator Individual Indicator